Natural selection has developed a crush on random mutations,
and this unrestrained desire has culminated in the evolution hypothesis, a massive superstructure for them to live in.
Natural selection is a maniacal lover who is always on a hysteric hunt for the finest new fashionable mutations for an organism.
In other words, if not for the mesmerizing charm of any updated mutations, this real love would have ended in a painful breakup,
and the evolutionary process would come to a halt,
because nature selection requires a large number of mutations in order to present itself with a wide set of alternatives.
As a result, the fortunate bearers of these mutations are virtually idolised by natural selection,
while making the life of the carriers of the other unbecoming heinous mutations a real hell on earth,
finally, the lucky one will end up as a flawless creature in the eyes of this utter injustice of natural selection,
and condescendingly lets this lucky creature live in peace with its surroundings.
According to the fundamental premise of this theory, life normally progresses from a simple form to a more sophisticated one,
through mutations and natural selection.
Since those who postulated this theory lived in the nineteenth century,
and almost nothing was known about the unimaginable complexity of trillions of trillions of mechanisms of biochemical activities,
that must work \'\'Simultaneously\'\' to make a living cell alive,
they had a right to imagine that the living cell is just a simple thing.
All biological activities within every living cell are controlled and determined by DNA, the genetic material that governs and regulates them.
Before a cell multiplies and divides into new daughter cells,
biomolecules and organelles must be replicated in order to be distributed throughout the new daughter cells.
To guarantee that each new cell obtains the right number of chromosomes,
the DNA inside the nucleus of a live cell must be duplicated as well.
So, they can function similarly to the parent cell.
When a specific enzyme binds DNA nucleotides, which are the building blocks of DNA,
in a sequence that matches the original DNA strand, new DNA molecules are created.
All living cells have a variety of extremely complicated processes in place to prevent mutations or permanent alterations in the DNA sequence.
Most DNA polymerases \"check their work\" during DNA synthesis, correcting the majority of mispaired bases in a process known as proofreading.
Any residual mispaired bases can be recognised and replaced immediately after DNA synthesis, a process known as mismatch repair.
If DNA is injured, it can be repaired through a variety of methods such as chemical reversal, excision repair, and double-stranded break repair.
This scrutiny process is tremendously important in preventing any uncontrollable number of mutations in newly synthesized DNA strands.
However, if the proofreading process fails, the erroneous nucleotides are no longer removed.
In this case, mutations can rapidly accumulate throughout chromosomes.
This astonishing error-correction process has the ability to shake the basis of genetic materials\' \'\'Solo Reliance\'\' on random mutations during evolution,
with the indispensable assistance of the purported all-knowing natural selection,
and the oversimplified postulations, which rely on random mutations as the only key underpinning for the theory of evolution.
If the emergence of random mutations always does a great favour for natural selection, since it offers more varieties to choose from,
Why did this so-called natural selection create an incredibly complex biological system for \'\'Correcting and Eliminating\'\' mutations during the replication of genetic material?
It seems like an unacceptable logical fallacy to say the least.
“Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand”