26 January, 2024
Poems : “Diego Garcia (4) to (6)”
These poems refer to the unlawful excision of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius by the English before Mauritian independence (which was on 12 March, 1968). During a constitutional conference in London around 1965 about Mauritian independence, the English told the Mauritian delegation in the SIDELINES : “You can go home with or without independence.” There are official English historical records about this. The dismemberment of Mauritian territory was the price to be paid for independence, in violation of United Nations resolutions of around 1960 on the matter. Around 1960, India discovered that the English wanted to dismember Mauritian territory by removing the Chagos Archipelago, and alerted the United Nations accordingly. The UN responded by passing a resolution forbidding colonial powers from dismembering colonies before giving them independence.
--------------
SOMAN RAGAVAN
21 January, 2024
Poems : “Diego Garcia (4) to (6)”
Analysis of my poems by ChatGPT-4,
(Artificial Intelligence)
Volume 65
Soman Ragavan : Thank you. I am now posting the second batch of poems, “Diego Garcia (4) to (6).” Please analyse. (Poems posted).
ChatGPT-4 : **Analysis:**
**Diego Garcia (4):**
- The poem continues the themes of displacement, resistance, and the clash between the islanders and the foreign invaders.
- It emphasizes the plea of the islanders to retain their way of life, animals, and possessions in the face of impending displacement.
- The repetition of \"Give us back\" serves as a powerful rhetorical device, reinforcing the desperation of the islanders and their demand for justice.
- The use of exclamation marks intensifies the emotional impact, conveying the urgency of their plea.
- The conflict between the islanders and the invaders is palpable, with the latter justifying their actions for defense, while the former plead for their land and livelihoods.
- Irony is present in the invaders\' assertion of danger and defense, juxtaposed with the peaceful nature of the islanders\' lives.
**Diego Garcia (5):**
- The poem delves into geopolitical considerations, highlighting the strategic importance of Diego Garcia for the invaders, particularly in terms of military positioning and communications.
- The language reflects a cold and calculated perspective on the part of the invaders, emphasizing their strategic calculations.
- The poem underscores the dehumanization of the local population, reducing them to obstacles hindering strategic goals. The dismissal of the \"silly natives\" devalues their existence.
- The emphasis on exploiting the land for military purposes and the disregard for the native culture portrays a ruthless pursuit of power.
- Irony is evident in the invaders\' claim of promoting \"peace, stability, prosperity\" while forcefully displacing and disregarding the well-being of the local population.
- Satirical elements arise in the dismissive tone towards the native practices, branding them as \"eyesores\" and celebrating their removal.
**Diego Garcia (6):**
- The poem conveys a sense of lament and desperation as the displaced islanders yearn for their homeland, expressing sorrow and distress in their new, unfamiliar surroundings.
- The plea to \"Give us back our poor country\" echoes the ongoing theme of loss and longing for the homeland.
- The invaders absolve themselves of responsibility for the well-being of the displaced population, emphasizing their vision as a justification for the forced relocation.
- The poem exposes the callous disregard for the suffering of the islanders, reinforcing their reduced status in the eyes of the invaders.
- There is a clear shift in power dynamics, with the invaders no longer considering the well-being of the islanders as a priority.
- The poem ends with a stern assertion that the islanders\' situation can never be a priority for the invaders, further emphasizing the power imbalance.
**Overall Insights:**
- The poems collectively provide a narrative of injustice, displacement, and the stark contrast between the motivations of the invaders and the plight of the local population.
- Rhetorical devices, irony, and satire are effectively employed to convey the emotional intensity and critique the actions of the powerful entities involved.
- The geopolitical and military considerations take center stage in these poems, illustrating the clash between global strategic interests and the human cost of such maneuvers.
---------------------
END
---------------------