(Part) AnalysisByQwen2.5-Max AI-Volume 27- Poem-SlaveryRevisited--23April2025

SOMAN RAGAVAN

23 April, 2025

Subject : Poem : Analysis of “Slavery revisited”

 https://allpoetry.com/poem/18413844-AnalysisByQwen2.5-Max-AI-Volume-27--Poem-SlaveryRevisited--23Apri-by-Soman-Ragavan/ 

 

Analysis by Qwen2.5 Max AI

(Artificial Intelligence)

Volume 27

 

 

(1)

Soman Ragavan :

Hello. I will post one of my poems for analysis. Could you please comment extensively, mentioning literary genres, styles, themes, poetic language, poetic philosophies, comparison with poets of England, America, India, Africa from 1700 to 1900 and as from 1945.

At college in 1968, I studied some poems of Oliver Goldsmith (1728-1774), Gordon Byron (1788-1824), Samuel T. Coleridge (1772-1834), William Wordsworth (1770-1850), Robert Browning (1812-1889), Mathew Arnold (1822-1888), Alfred Tennyson (1809-1892) and some other poets of that era.  Make any comments or comparisons you wish on my poems. Say if there are other contemporary poets who write as I do and compare my poetry with theirs. I live in Mauritius, an island in the Indian Ocean. 

I will post background notes and my poem after you write.

(2)

Qwen2.5 Max AI : 

Qwen2.5 Max AI :

Certainly, Soman Ragavan! Before you share your poem and background notes, I’ll provide an overview of how I will approach the analysis based on your request. This framework will ensure that the feedback is comprehensive and aligns with your expectations.

 

### **Framework for Analysis**

 

1. **Literary Genres and Styles**:

   - Identify whether your poem falls under traditional genres such as lyric, narrative, dramatic, or experimental forms.

   - Discuss stylistic elements like meter, rhyme scheme, free verse, imagery, symbolism, tone, and voice.

   - Compare these aspects to poets from the 18th and 19th centuries (e.g., Romanticism, Victorian poetry) and mid-20th century modernists/postmodernists.

 

2. **Themes**:

   - Explore overarching themes in your work—nature, identity, love, existentialism, colonialism, postcolonialism, etc.

   - Relate these themes to those explored by English Romantic poets (Wordsworth, Coleridge), Victorians (Tennyson, Arnold), American Transcendentalists (Emerson, Whitman), Indian poets influenced by colonialism (Tagore, Aurobindo), and African voices addressing decolonization (Okot p’Bitek, Soyinka).

 

3. **Poetic Language**:

   - Analyze diction, syntax, figurative language (metaphors, similes, personification), allusions, and wordplay.

   - Highlight any unique linguistic features tied to your cultural context (Mauritian Creole, French, Hindi influences, etc.).

 

4. **Philosophical Underpinnings**:

   - Examine philosophical ideas embedded in your poem—humanism, existentialism, mysticism, environmentalism, etc.

   - Compare them to philosophical currents in Western literature (Romantic idealism vs. Modernist disillusionment) and Eastern philosophies (Hindu/Buddhist thought, Confucianism).

 

5. **Historical Context and Comparisons**:

   - Situate your poem within literary movements spanning 1700–1900 (Enlightenment, Romanticism, Realism, Symbolism) and post-1945 trends (Modernism, Postmodernism, Global Literature).

   - Draw parallels between your style and specific poets’ works, considering both European traditions and non-Western perspectives.

 

6. **Contemporary Voices**:

   - Identify living poets who might share thematic concerns or stylistic techniques with you.

   - Consider global writers like Derek Walcott (Caribbean), Seamus Heaney (Ireland), Kamala Das (India), Warsan Shire (Somalia/UK), Ocean Vuong (Vietnam/USA), and others who reflect multicultural identities.

 

---

 

Once you share your poem and background notes, I can apply this framework to offer detailed insights into its artistic merits, historical resonance, and place within broader literary traditions. Please go ahead and post your poem—I look forward to engaging deeply with it!

 

(3)

Soman Ragavan :  

About my poem “Slavery revisited.” This is about how the English treated Mauritians during colonization. (Mauritius achieved independence on 12 March, 1968). Slavery ended in Mauritius in 1835. The slaves (mostly from Africa and Madagascar) who were working in cane fields were free to leave. Many of them left the sugar cane fields. The sugar industry risked collapsing. The English needed the sugar to be sent to England. The English started sending Indian workers from India to some of their colonies, including Mauritius. The working conditions of the Indian workers were quite like those of the former slaves.  Thus, I compare this period of Mauritian history to a new slavery period. Hence, the title of the poem “Slavery revisited.” I will post the poem in Parts; there are nine parts containing 45 stanzas in all. Here are background notes.

 

(4)

Soman Ragavan :

Thank you. Here is Part one of the poem. (Posted).

 

(5)

Qwen2.5 Max AI :  

### **Analysis of “SLAVERY REVISITED”**

 

Soman Ragavan’s poem, *“Slavery Revisited,”* is a powerful meditation on the historical and moral complexities surrounding slavery. The work resonates deeply with themes of colonialism, exploitation, and humanity’s capacity for both cruelty and resistance. Below, I analyze your poem through the framework provided earlier, drawing comparisons to literary traditions from England, America, India, Africa, and beyond.

 

---

 

### **1. Literary Genres and Styles**

 

#### Genre:

The poem can be classified as a **narrative-dramatic lyric**, blending storytelling (narrative) with rhetorical intensity (dramatic). It reads almost like a dramatic monologue, where the speaker recounts debates about slavery in formalized language reminiscent of parliamentary proceedings or philosophical dialogues. This style aligns it with works by poets such as **John Milton** (*Paradise Lost*) and **William Cowper** (*The Task*), who often employed elevated diction to explore weighty ethical dilemmas.

 

#### Style:

- **Meter and Structure**: Your stanzas are written in quatrains (four-line stanzas) with alternating rhymes (ABCB pattern). This structure creates a rhythmic flow that mirrors the ebb and flow of debate mentioned in Stanza 4 (“The tide ebb'd and the tide flow'd”). The use of iambic pentameter gives the lines a formal, measured quality akin to classical English poetry.

 

- **Tone**: The tone oscillates between ironic detachment (“The full benefits of slavery did they consider”) and visceral condemnation (“Into their savagery they still wallow’d”). This duality reflects the tension between rationalizing injustice and confronting its brutality—a hallmark of Romantic-era poets like **William Blake** and **Samuel Taylor Coleridge**.

 

- **Imagery**: Vivid imagery dominates, especially in the final stanza: “In their wake, nothing but terror and trouble / Ramm’d daily upon God’s suffering people.” These lines evoke biblical overtones, recalling Old Testament prophets lamenting human sinfulness. Such imagery connects you to writers like **Derek Walcott**, whose epic *Omeros* similarly grapples with history, divinity, and oppression.

 

---

 

### **2. Themes**

 

#### Colonialism and Slavery:

Your poem addresses one of the darkest chapters in human history—the transatlantic slave trade and indentured servitude. By revisiting this period, you engage with postcolonial critiques of empire-building, echoing voices like **Frantz Fanon** (*The Wretched of the Earth*) and **Chinua Achebe** (*Things Fall Apart*).

 

However, unlike many contemporary poets who focus solely on victimhood, your work highlights the complicity of those who justified slavery through economic arguments. Lines like “‘Twas nonsense to stop the lucrative slave trade” expose the cold logic of exploitation, much as **Kamau Brathwaite** does in his Caribbean poetry.

 

#### Historical Memory vs. Revisionism:

The epigraph referencing attempts to “re-write the history of colonialism” underscores the theme of erasure versus accountability. Here, your poem aligns with modernist poets like **W.B. Yeats** (*Easter, 1916*), who wrestled with how societies remember—or forget—their past atrocities.

 

#### Morality and Justice:

Throughout, there is an implicit call for justice, framed within a critique of institutionalized evil. This aligns you with **Mathew Arnold**, whose poems often questioned societal values, and **Rabindranath Tagore**, whose verses championed human dignity against oppressive systems.

 

---

 

### **3. Poetic Language**

 

#### Diction:

Your vocabulary is deliberately archaic at times—words like “heat’d,” “oratories,” and “shalt” evoke 18th-century parliamentary discourse. This choice not only situates the poem historically but also distances readers emotionally, forcing them to reflect critically rather than react impulsively.

 

#### Figurative Language:

- **Irony**: The phrase “The full benefits of slavery did they consider” drips with irony, exposing the absurdity of justifying human bondage.

- **Symbolism**: The metaphor of tides (“The tide ebb'd and the tide flow'd”) symbolizes cyclical struggles—slavery may end, but its legacies persist, much like waves crashing repeatedly onto shore.

 

#### Allusions:

The reference to “God’s suffering people” invokes Judeo-Christian theology, paralleling **John Donne**’s metaphysical meditations on divine justice. Meanwhile, the mention of “Mother India” hints at pan-Indian solidarity, linking you to nationalist poets like **Sarojini Naidu**.

 

---

 

### **4. Philosophical Underpinnings**

 

Philosophically, your poem interrogates Enlightenment ideals of progress and reason, showing how they were weaponized to justify barbarism. This skepticism toward rationalism places you alongside **Romantic poets** like Wordsworth and Coleridge, who rejected industrialization’s dehumanizing effects. Simultaneously, your critique of systemic violence aligns with existential thinkers like **Albert Camus**, who explored humanity’s capacity for both creation and destruction.

 

Moreover, the poem implicitly champions empathy and collective responsibility, echoing Eastern philosophies like Buddhism and Vedanta, which emphasize interconnectedness. For instance, the phrase “God’s suffering people” suggests a universal brotherhood transcending national boundaries.

 

---

 

### **5. Historical Context and Comparisons**

 

#### Pre-1900 Traditions:

- **Romanticism**: Like Wordsworth and Shelley, you valorize emotional truth over detached reason, urging readers to confront slavery’s horrors viscerally.

- **Victorian Poetry**: Echoes of Tennyson’s moral seriousness appear, particularly in your indictment of greed (“To perpetuate slavery, the finest oration they made”).

 

#### Post-1945 Trends:

- **Postcolonial Literature**: Your focus on colonial crimes recalls **Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o** (*Decolonising the Mind*) and **Aimé Césaire** (*Discourse on Colonialism*).

- **Global Voices**: Contemporary Mauritian writers like **Ananda Devi** explore similar intersections of identity, migration, and power, though her prose style contrasts sharply with your poetic form.

 

---

 

### **6. Contemporary Voices**

 

Among living poets, your work bears resemblance to **Derek Walcott**, who chronicled Caribbean histories through lush, layered verse. Similarly, **Warsan Shire**’s unflinching portrayals of displacement and trauma share thematic ground with your exploration of forced migration under slavery.

 

Closer to home, Indian Ocean poets like **Malcolm de Chazal** blend mysticism with social commentary, offering another point of comparison. However, your formal rigor sets you apart from more experimental contemporaries.

 

---

 

### **Conclusion**

 

*“Slavery Revisited”* stands as a testament to the enduring relevance of historical memory in shaping our understanding of justice and morality. Its blend of classical form and postcolonial critique ensures that it speaks across centuries, engaging with both Romantic sensibilities and modern concerns. While rooted in Mauritius’ unique cultural tapestry, the poem transcends geographical boundaries, joining a global chorus of voices demanding accountability for humanity’s shared past.

 

Please share Part 2 if available—I’d love to continue analyzing!

(6)

Soman Ragavan :

Here is Part two of the poem. (Posted).

 

(7)

Qwen2.5 Max AI : 

### **Analysis of *“Slavery Revisited” – Part 2***

 

Soman Ragavan’s continuation of the poem deepens its exploration of colonial exploitation, transitioning from the abolition of slavery to the rise of indentured servitude. This section reveals how systems of oppression adapt and persist under new guises, exposing the cyclical nature of human suffering. Below, I will analyze *Part 2* using the same framework as before, while integrating it with insights drawn from Part 1.

 

---

 

### **1. Literary Genres and Styles**

 

#### Genre:

The second part maintains the narrative-dramatic lyric style established in Part 1. However, there is a shift toward more explicit social commentary, akin to satirical works by poets like **Jonathan Swift** (*A Modest Proposal*) or **Percy Bysshe Shelley** (*The Mask of Anarchy*). The biting critique of “contracts cleverly concoct’d” evokes Swiftian irony, highlighting how institutions manipulate language to mask injustice.

 

#### Style:

- **Meter and Structure**: The quatrains continue with their rhythmic regularity, but the imagery becomes darker and more visceral in this segment. For example, the juxtaposition of “A Passage to Hell” against “a good future as well” creates an unsettling contrast that destabilizes the reader.

 

- **Tone**: While Part 1 was marked by detachment and historical reflection, Part 2 adopts a more accusatory tone. Lines like “What an exquisite place at which to dwell” drip with sarcasm, condemning both colonial authorities (“Sir Shark”) and the exploitative systems they perpetuated.

 

- **Imagery**: The metaphor of sharks feeding on distress symbolizes predatory capitalism—a theme explored by modernist poets like **T.S. Eliot** (*The Waste Land*) and postcolonial writers like **V.S. Naipaul*. The image of thumbs being pressed also recalls bureaucratic dehumanization, reminiscent of Kafkaesque alienation.

 

---

 

### **2. Themes**

 

#### Continuity of Oppression:

One of the central themes here is the seamless transition from slavery to indentured labor. You expose how colonial powers, after abolishing one form of exploitation, simply replaced it with another. This echoes critiques made by **W.E.B. Du Bois** in *Black Reconstruction*, where he argues that economic systems designed to oppress rarely disappear—they merely transform.

 

#### Migration and Deception:

The phrase “Exciting contracts cleverly were concoct’d” highlights the deceptive recruitment tactics used to lure Indian laborers into indenture. This resonates strongly with contemporary discussions about migrant exploitation, particularly in regions reliant on cheap labor. Your focus on migration links you to diasporic poets like **Mahmoud Darwish** (Palestinian displacement) and **Ocean Vuong** (Vietnamese-American experiences).

 

#### Power Dynamics:

The personification of colonial authority as “Sir Shark” underscores the predatory relationship between oppressor and oppressed. This aligns with Marxist interpretations of history, where ruling classes exploit subordinate groups for profit—a theme explored extensively by **Bertolt Brecht** in his plays and poems.

 

---

 

### **3. Poetic Language**

 

#### Diction:

Your word choice remains formal yet charged with emotion. Words like “exquisite,” “godsend,” and “captur’d” carry ironic weight, revealing the gap between promises and realities faced by indentured laborers. The use of archaic terms such as “‘pon” adds gravitas, situating the poem within a tradition of protest literature dating back to Milton’s *Areopagitica*.

 

#### Figurative Language:

- **Irony**: The line “Work and money, and a good future as well” is laced with bitter irony, mocking the false promises made to vulnerable populations. Similarly, “A Passage to Hell” subverts E.M. Forster’s optimistic novel *A Passage to India*, suggesting instead a journey into despair.

- **Symbolism**: “Sir Shark” serves as a potent symbol of colonial greed and cunning, paralleling Blake’s “dark Satanic mills” in *Jerusalem*. It encapsulates the predatory nature of imperialism.

 

#### Allusions:

By referencing “Mother India,” you evoke nationalist sentiments tied to figures like **Rabindranath Tagore** and **Subhas Chandra Bose**, who fought against British rule. At the same time, the mention of “Mama Africa” connects your work to pan-Africanist thinkers like **Marcus Garvey** and poets like **Langston Hughes**, bridging two continents united by shared struggles.

 

---

 

### **4. Philosophical Underpinnings**

 

Philosophically, this section delves deeper into existential questions about freedom and agency. The laborers are described as “enroll’d legally : they were indentur’d,” emphasizing how legal frameworks can legitimize coercion and strip individuals of autonomy. This critique resonates with existentialist ideas explored by **Jean-Paul Sartre** and **Simone de Beauvoir*, who argued that true freedom requires dismantling oppressive structures.

 

Additionally, your portrayal of systemic violence reflects Buddhist notions of *dukkha* (suffering caused by attachment to flawed systems). Like Tagore, you seem to advocate for spiritual liberation alongside material emancipation.

 

---

 

### **5. Historical Context and Comparisons**

 

#### Pre-1900 Traditions:

- **Romanticism**: Your indictment of industrial-age exploitation aligns with Romantic critiques of mechanized society, as seen in Shelley’s *Queen Mab*.

- **Victorian Poetry**: The moral outrage expressed in lines like “They were enroll’d legally : they were indentur’d” mirrors Arnold’s lamentations over societal decay in *Dover Beach*.

 

#### Post-1945 Trends:

- **Postcolonial Literature**: Your focus on indentured labor places you in dialogue with authors like **V.S. Naipaul* (*A House for Mr Biswas*) and **Kamala Markandaya* (*Nectar in a Sieve*), who depict the lingering impacts of colonial policies on South Asian communities.

- **Global Voices**: Contemporary Mauritian writers like **Ananda Devi* explore similar themes of displacement and identity, though her experimental prose differs stylistically from your formal verse.

 

---

 

### **6. Contemporary Voices**

 

Among living poets, your work shares affinities with **Warsan Shire**, whose poems about refugees and migrants highlight the dangers of false promises. Similarly, **Ocean Vuong*’s exploration of intergenerational trauma and survival parallels your examination of inherited wounds from colonialism.

 

In the Indian Ocean region, your blend of historical critique and poetic form recalls **Malcolm de Chazal*’s philosophical musings, albeit with greater emphasis on social justice. Globally, your voice joins those of **Derek Walcott* and **Seamus Heaney*, who grapple with legacies of conquest and resilience.

 

---

 

### **Conclusion**

 

*Part 2* of *“Slavery Revisited”* amplifies the poem’s indictment of colonial exploitation, revealing how systems of oppression evolve rather than vanish. Its rich imagery, ironic diction, and moral urgency make it a compelling addition to postcolonial literature. By connecting African and Indian histories through shared experiences of subjugation, you craft a universal narrative that transcends borders while remaining deeply rooted in Mauritius’ unique cultural landscape.

 

Would you like me to summarize key takeaways or provide suggestions for further development?

(8)

Soman Ragavan :  

Here is Part three of the poem. (Posted).

 

(9)

Qwen2.5 Max AI :

### **Analysis of *“Slavery Revisited” – Part 3***

 

Soman Ragavan’s third .... section of the poem brings the narrative to a poignant conclusion, emphasizing both the immediate suffering of indentured laborers and the long-term consequences of their exploitation. This segment delves into themes of ignorance, resistance, and intergenerational struggle, expanding the scope of the poem to encompass not just historical injustice but also its enduring legacy. Below, I analyze this part using the established framework while integrating insights from Parts 1 and 2.

 --------------------